sustainable china

researching religious values for ecological sustainability

Archive for the ‘Yale’ tag

the end of environmentalism?

without comments

By James Miller

In October I was invited to participate in a symposium on International Perspectives on Nature and Culture organized by the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia. I was on a panel responding to a paper by the French philosopher Augustin Berque. His most recent book is called La pensée paysagère (Paris: Archibooks 2008), and it articulates a fundamental distinction between “thinking of the countryside” or “la pensée du paysage” and “country thinking” or “la pensée paysagère.” In modernity, he claims, we have ideas about “nature” or “the environment,” but we do not have ideas that are grounded in nature as a biophysical reality or which express themselves in the flourishing of nature. We have too much “pensée du paysage” and not enough “pensée paysagère.” The contradiction of modernity is that the theorization, symbolization and fetishization of nature as a concept proceeds apace and at the very same time as the annihilation of nature as a biophysical reality. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Written by james

December 1st, 2008 at 4:46 pm

Posted in Questions

Tagged with , , ,

daoism and ecology

with one comment

By James Miller

I recently had the pleasure of participating in the tenth anniversary of the founding of the Forum on Religion and Ecology, now housed at Yale University. While I was there I managed to see for the first time the Chinese translation of the book Daoism and Ecology that I co-edited some ten years ago when I was a graduate student at Boston University. 

The book arose out of one of a series of conferences on world religions and ecology, organized by the founders of FORE, Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim, at the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions.

The translation of the book was accomplished several years ago by my friend Chen Xia at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, but the publication, by Jiangsu Education Press, had been held up for bureaucratic reasons. In China all books that are published have to go through an approval process, and books on the topic of religion also need a second level of approval from the State Administration for Religious Affairs. 

What speeded the approval process up was that Mary Evelyn Tucker, John Grim, Chen Xia and I had the good fortune of arranging a meeting with Pan Yue, the vice-minister of the State Administration for Environmental Protection, in Beijing this summer. At that meeting, Minister Pan expressed a keen interest in the volumes published as a result of these conferences and wanted them all to be translated into Chinese. Fortunately we had already got the wheels in process to publish the volumes on Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism, and all that was lacking was the necessary approvals. I don’t know if Minister Pan personally intervened in our favour, but soon after we left China this summer, we learned that the books would be published in the fall. You can read about the Daoism and Ecology book on the Amazon.cn website.

  • Share/Bookmark

Written by james

November 29th, 2008 at 12:32 am